An Integrated G2M and RAFSI Model for Improved Leasing Customer Selection

Authors

  • Rakhmat Dedi Gunawan Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia image/svg+xml Author
  • Junhai Wang Zhejiang Technical Institute of Economics image/svg+xml Author

Keywords:

Decision Support System, G2M Weighting, Leasing Customer Selection, RAFSI Method, Risk Assessment

Abstract

This research is motivated by the problem of high credit risk in leasing companies, which is caused by the process of selecting prospective customers that tends to be subjective, inconsistent, and reliant on a single indicator, making it less able to comprehensively reflect customer eligibility. This study aims to develop a model for selecting prospective leasing customers that is objective and systematic through the integration of the Grey Geometric Mean (G2M) method as a criteria weighting tool and the Ranking of Alternatives through Functional Mapping of Criterion Sub-Intervals into a Single Interval (RAFSI) method as a ranking technique. Assessment data were obtained from a number of customer candidates based on financial and non-financial criteria relevant to credit risk. The criteria weights were determined objectively using G2M, and then used in the evaluation and ranking process of alternatives with RAFSI based on the ideal and anti-ideal concepts. The results of the study showed that Customer Candidate 11 ranked first with a preference value of 0.74557, followed by Customer Candidate 5 in second place with a value of 0.65177, and Customer Candidate 14 in third place with a value of 0.62825. These findings demonstrate that the proposed model is capable of producing clear, consistent, and easily interpretable rankings, making it effective as a decision support system in the selection of leasing customer candidates and contributing to the reduction of credit risk.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Setiawansyah, S. Sintaro, and A. A. Aldino, “MCDM Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory and PIPRECIA in Customer Loan Eligibility Recommendations,” J. Informatics, Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 212–220, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.47065/jieee.v3i2.1628.

[2] E. Alfonsius and B. Bonitalia, “Decision Support System for Granting of Credit Using Website-Based Promethee Method (Case Study at BPR Abc Bank),” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 123–136, 2023. doi: 10.58602/chain.v1i3.49.

[3] C.-N. Wang, V. T. Viet, T. P. Ho, V. T. Nguyen, and V. T. Nguyen, “Multi-Criteria Decision Model for the Selection of Suppliers in the Textile Industry,” Symmetry, vol. 12, no. 6. p. 979, 2020. doi: 10.3390/sym12060979.

[4] A. Asistyasari, M. W. Arshad, I. Chandra, Y. Nuryaman, and V. H. Saputra, “Integration of RECA Weighting and MARCOS Methods in Decision Support Systems for the Selection of the Best Customer Recommendations,” J. Inform. dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 122–136, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.33365/jatika.v6i2.219.

[5] T. Ahmadi Pargo and S. Hashemkhani Zolfani, “Developing an Expert System for Hardware Selection in Internet of Things-Based System Design: Grey ITARA-COBRA Approach (With an Example in the Agricultural Domain),” Information, vol. 16, no. 6. 2025. doi: 10.3390/info16060425.

[6] B. Kizielewicz, J. Więckowski, and W. Sałabun, “SESP-SPOTIS: Advancing Stochastic Approach for Re-identifying MCDA Models BT - Computational Science – ICCS 2024,” 2024, pp. 281–295. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-63751-3_19.

[7] B. Efe, B. Yelbey, and L. Efe, “Unmanned aerial vehicle selection using interval valued q rung orthopair fuzzy number based MAIRCA method,” Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilim. Derg., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2025.

[8] P. Agyemang, E. M. Kwofie, J. I. Baum, D. Wang, and E. A. Kwofie, “Environmental-Health Convergence: A deep learning-oriented decision support system for catalyzing sustainable healthy food systems,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 185, p. 106309, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106309.

[9] N. Hendrastuty, S. Setiawansyah, M. G. An’ars, F. A. Rahmadianti, V. H. Saputra, and M. Rahman, “G2M weighting: a new approach based on multi-objective assessment data (case study of MOORA method in determining supplier performance evaluation),” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 403–416, 2025, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v38.i1.pp403-416.

[10] J. Wang, S. Setiawansyah, F. Ulum, A. Yudhistira, and A. D. Wahyudi, “Optimization of Production Operator Performance Assessment with Grey Geometric Mean Weighting and Combinative Distance-based Assessment,” Komputika J. Sist. Komput., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 211–220, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.34010/komputika.v14i2.15977.

[11] P. Simamora and A. T. Priandika, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Kredit Kendaraan Menggunakan G2M Weighting dan Metode Comprehensive Distance Based Ranking,” Bull. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 5, no. 4 SE-, pp. 392–403, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v5i4.518.

[12] Y. Rahmanto, J. Wang, S. Setiawansyah, A. Yudhistira, D. Darwis, and R. R. Suryono, “Optimizing Employee Admission Selection Using G2M Weighting and MOORA Method,” Paradig. - J. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.31294/p.v27i1.8224.

[13] O. Y. Akbulut and Y. Aydın, “A Hybrid Multidimensional Performance Measurement Model Using the MSD-MPSI-RAWEC Model for Turkish Banks,” J. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Univ. Econ. Adm. Sci. Fac., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1157–1183, 2024, doi: 10.30798/makuiibf.1464469.

[14] A. Çilek and O. Şeyranlıoğlu, “Measuring the Financial Performance of Reinsurance Companies in Türkiye with LODECI, CRADIS and AROMAN MCDM Methods TT - LODECI, CRADIS ve AROMAN,” Int. J. Bus. Econ. Stud., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.54821/uiecd.1587675.

[15] A. Alosta, O. Elmansuri, and I. Badi, “Resolving a location selection problem by means of an integrated AHP-RAFSI approach,” Reports Mech. Eng., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 135–142, 2021, doi: 10.31181/rme200102135a.

[16] S. Korucuk, A. Aytekin, Ö. Görçün, V. Simic, and Ö. Faruk Görçün, “Warehouse site selection for humanitarian relief organizations using an interval-valued fermatean fuzzy LOPCOW-RAFSI model,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 192, p. 110160, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2024.110160.

Article:
ONLINE FIRST
15-08-2026
First published online

PUBLISHED DATE SCHEDULE

24-08-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

An Integrated G2M and RAFSI Model for Improved Leasing Customer Selection. (2026). Journal of Computer and Data Science, 1(1), 48-68. https://doi.org/10.67449/jcoda.v1i1.3