Editorial Process

 
⇄
Editorial Workflow

The editorial workflow of Journal of Computer and Data Science (JCODA) follows a structured process to promote consistency, transparency, academic quality, and ethical standards throughout manuscript handling.

01
Submission

The manuscript is submitted through the journal's online editorial system.

02
Initial Screening

The Editorial Office checks the manuscript's scope, formatting, completeness, originality, and compliance with the journal's ethical requirements.

03
Editor Assessment

An editor evaluates the manuscript's relevance, originality, academic merit, and suitability for external peer review.

04
Reviewer Assignment

Qualified reviewers are invited based on their subject expertise, academic competence, and independence from the submitted work.

05
Peer Review

The manuscript undergoes external peer review to assess its originality, methodological soundness, clarity, significance, and contribution to the field.

06
Editorial Decision

The editor considers the reviewers' comments, the manuscript's quality, and the journal's publication criteria before issuing an editorial decision.

07
Revision

Authors may be asked to revise their manuscripts in response to reviewer and editor feedback. Revised submissions may undergo further evaluation when necessary.

08
Final Decision and Production

Once accepted, the manuscript proceeds to copyediting, typesetting, proofreading, and publication in accordance with the journal's production procedures.