☰ Main Menu
Revision Policy
Authors receiving a revision request are expected to carefully address all comments raised by the reviewers and editor. Revisions should improve the quality, clarity, validity, and presentation of the manuscript.
Authors should submit:
- A revised version of the manuscript.
- A detailed response to reviewer comments.
- A clear explanation of changes made in the manuscript.
- Justification for any reviewer comment that is not followed.
Response to Reviewers
Authors are encouraged to respond to each reviewer comment individually. Responses should be professional, evidence-based, and clearly indicate where changes have been made.
Recommended Response Format
- Reviewer comment
- Author response
- Description of the revision
- Page/section/paragraph where the change was made
Resubmission and Further Review
A revised manuscript may be returned to the original reviewers for further evaluation, particularly when major revisions have been requested. The editor may also make a decision based on the revised manuscript without additional external review when appropriate.
Revision Deadline:
Authors should submit revisions within the deadline specified in the editorial decision letter. If additional time is required, authors should contact the Editorial Office before the deadline.
Authors should submit revisions within the deadline specified in the editorial decision letter. If additional time is required, authors should contact the Editorial Office before the deadline.
Important:
A revised manuscript is not automatically accepted. The manuscript must satisfy the editor and, where applicable, reviewers before a final acceptance decision is issued.
A revised manuscript is not automatically accepted. The manuscript must satisfy the editor and, where applicable, reviewers before a final acceptance decision is issued.
